站内搜索SEARCH  
   
    (关键字)
 
首页>>中心成果>>网络法律评论 
国家介入:我国ODR建设的新思路
     点击次数:260

国家介入:我国ODR建设的新思路

刘 哲 玮

 

电子空间中缺乏规则和制度,因而更应该强调权威。[1]

——Ethan Katsh

 

【内容提要】ODR作为一种新兴纠纷解决方式,首先是在以美国为代表的西方国家兴起。文章首先对国外的ODR进行了考察,并对一些共识性的结论加以归纳。随后,以我国目前仅有的两个ODR网站为对象,从实证的角度分析了二者的异同。结合我国国情,发现与国外ODR建设主要依靠市场主体和民间组织推动不同,我国目前必须在国家介入的情况下,方能确保ODR的健康发展,最后对国家介入odr的途径和方式进行了简要的概括。

【关 键 词】ODR  ADR  纠纷解决  国家干预

 

Abstract: As a new method for dispute resolution, ODR originated in some western countries, especially in the US. The author observes foreign ODR at first, and describes some common characteristics. Then he does an empirical research, focusing on the similarities and differences between the only two ODR websites in China. What’s more, He argues that unlike the western countries, Chinese ODR websites can not depend on the private sectors, thus the government should play an important role in developing the course of ODR . Finally, he summarizes the approaches and manners of public regulation.

 

Key Word: ODR     ADR      Dispute Resolution     Public Regulation



刘哲玮,北京大学法学院诉讼法学专业06级博士研究生,emailzhewei_liu@163.com

[1] Ethan Katsh, "Dispute Resolution without Borders: Some Implications for the Emergence of Law in Cyberspace", First Monday (Online), vol. 11, (2006). available at http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_2/katsh/index.html.

版权所有 北京大学法学院互联网法律中心Copyright www.pkunetlaw.cn All Rights Reserved
京ICP备10031151号